research found that 24% of administrative court proceedings for the blind sue
lost cause
does not belong to the scope of administrative litigation cases
temporary agencies, there is not an administrative body, how can a defendant ah. It is understood, including such cases included in each of the 7 percent of cases of people suing government officials dismissed the plaintiff's prosecution decision,
belstaff motorcycle jackets, or ruling dismissed the claim.
Kang and other 22 residents of a house facing demolition, they believe that the demolition issued by the Office of the However, the health of certain people in the indictment also said the demolition of the office does not have published such
Chung judge said, citizens, legal persons or other organizations, the government or the city housing authority of the competent administrative authority pursuant to the relevant housing demolition, compensation, resettlement and other issues against the ruling to the courts, and an administrative Litigation range. Prosecution does not belong to the scope of administrative litigation, should be ruled inadmissible, has been accepted, the court rejected prosecution. In this case, the demolition of the office of administrative law is not subject to the act it does not belong to the scope of administrative litigation cases.
blind like this prosecution,
12 sued by employees for the three units of Provid,
outlet belstaff, representing people suing government officials for 24% of cases. Yanqing County Court from research that 24% of cases of people suing government officials claim there is not the scope of administrative litigation, the complaint is not the main grid and so on, so people can not achieve the purpose of litigation.
such as Lee sued for rescission of Land and Resources Bureau for the third issue of The main plaintiffs do not have the qualifications, so the court rejected prosecution.
lost cause
limitation sued over
In addition, no interest in the main proceedings, more than limitation and other issues also contributed to the prosecution of lawsuits dismissed high rate of reason.
Wang v. monitoring unit called for the repeal of a city, No interest, the case finally closed way split CD.
another example, Liu Development and Reform Commission in 2001 against the third party did a two-year statute of limitations,
belstaff leather jacket, Liu lost their right to win,
belstaff panther jacket, was the court rejected prosecution.
prosecution reasons
lead the executive work in place
Yanqing court research suggests that some cases of people suing government officials are not in place because the administrative organs caused . Part of the administrative organ to exercise administrative powers,
belstaff jackets sale, the law Interpretation and follow-up processing is too casual, relatively easy to make people doubt the legality of administrative acts and the prosecution.
such as Wu ruling against the demolition of Construction Committee for rescission of can make a ruling such as the details are not taken to court.
prosecution reasons
Prussian officer for the activities of the people reported less
in popularizing and propagating, the focus mostly concentrated in the public, criminal area, for related administrative regulations and activities of the Administrative Procedure Law of the Franco-Prussian fewer people know little about the administrative proceedings.
popularizing and propagating the organization in court activities, due to the nature of the different areas and different targeted audience, involving civil, criminal popularizing and propagating more than 98%, and more on the administration of Health and penalties related injuries and and other issues related to litigation guidance to the executive branch, and less involved in the work of popularizing and propagating the masses. This also contributed to the prosecution of people suing government officials were dismissed after more than one reason.
Court Strategies
judicial recommendations made to the administrative law enforcement
solve these problems,
19 -year-old second-generation copy of Hollywood g, Yanqing court to require the administrative tribunal of judges to enhance pre-trial guidance, court indicating , after the Court Q & A work. Before the trial, active way of telephone or interviews relative to pre-trial administrative guidance and a clear deadline of proof, the evidence submitted in the form, proof of each party should bear the obligation to avoid litigation blind relative. Trial in a timely indicate in detail the rights and obligations of the parties, may bear the legal consequences of the rules and trial procedures to reduce the parties questioned the impartiality of justice. After the verdict, to carry out a return visit as the main vector of the case after the Q & A work contract, the parties to maximize the elimination of dissatisfaction, to prevent escalation.
In addition, the hospital has full judicial supervision and guidance of the proposed functions. Further improve and Construction Committee, the county government and other regular communication between the executive mechanism, the administrative judge found that the issue of depth at the same time, joint analysis of major projects within the jurisdiction planning initiatives such as the problems hidden in a timely manner to develop programs to avoid conflicts disputes occur. The problems of administrative law enforcement issue specific recommendations to rationalize judicial, law enforcement supervision and guidance of executive specification.
Chapter ancient newspaper correspondent Yang
Threaded Mode