Air Max Lebron Deposits of more than 10 million pe

court,cufflinks paul smith, involving banks argued, Longchamp card money was taken away, the public security organs have been on file for investigation, its financial losses are not by the banks. According to the provisions of bank cards, bank credit card customer credit card information and password storage, use responsible,wholesale nike air max,tods shoes men 动车~北戴河(下), the plaintiff card transactions within the financial system to be removed only by using the password held by the plaintiff's behavior, the plaintiff because of the lack of good care Password card due to loss of funds, shall be solely responsible for the plaintiff; Bank in accordance with provisions adopted security measures; the same time, the case involved a criminal offense,louis vuitton sunglasses evidence, the plaintiff should be criminals by the public security organs to recover stolen funds,stilettos shoes, rather than requiring banks to compensation.
court the bank should now lost


Longchamp that his savings stolen because the bank management in technology and safety defective or negligent, and thus used by criminals, through no fault of their own, the bank should take all his losses. Bank has not agreed to his request. Last resort, Longchamp, reported on the bank involved Fucheng District Court, requesting the court sentenced bank deposit compensation for his loss of 109,607 yuan,louis vuitton vintage 深圳广信酒店电话、地址、征询、预订-杭州到厦门动车月底开..., according to the same period in which compensation for bank lending rates of interest.

Fucheng District Court under the facts established and the determined support of Longchamp's claim, ruling bank deposit compensation for loss of 109,607 yuan, and Longchamp, which from February 20, 2009 until paid the date of the earlier interest on bank deposits. Ma net Chengdu Chinese Commercial News reporter Tang Xiaojun

Mianyang public Longchamp stolen bank card deposit more than 10 million. Last resort,Air Max Lebron, he will report on the bank involved in Mianyang Fucheng District Court, requiring banks to full compensation for the loss. Recently, Fucheng court verdict, the bank more than 10 million compensation for Longchamp. It is reported that the court case similar to the full amount of the bank, in Mianyang is the first time.

2009 年 2 19, Longchamp, belongs to a bank in Mianyang Pro Road branch ATM machine withdrawals, the card on the remaining 109,645.12 yuan. Two days later, the branch to Longchamp phone call, saying deposits of stolen bank card, asked to go to reconciliation. Confirmed stolen from 10.9 million yuan.

Longchamp, immediately to the police. Police investigation found that Longchamp card money on February 20, 2009, 21, was from the ATM machine to withdraw cash or transfer were a way removed. Meanwhile, the police found, since February 2009, the number of Mianyang City from criminals occurred in ATMs and card readers installed on the camera the way to get the victim bank card account number and password,ralph lauren buy 动车带旺厦门租车行业 租车热节后连续, and then copy the victims of bank card theft take account deposits theft.
Bank argued that criminals should recover
Recently, Mianyang Fucheng District Court which made verdicts. Court that the Longchamp in the bank to open a savings account to deposit funds, and for a bank card, the two sides establish a legally valid contractual relationship deposits. Longchamp enjoy the right to require banks to pay depositors, the bank bears the obligation to pay Mr. Xiang Shang.


deposits with banks on the card stolen

Longchamp that the bank does not prove that the reasons for self-service banking location will effectively protect the safety of depositors' funds.
trial judge described the case of Li, according to the regulations, banks pay to depositors deposit, I can either pay to depositors, it can pay to its agents. The case is not covered by deposit Longchamp I extracted, but the ATM machine was removed. Neither that bank teller who uses Longchamp holding bank card, also failed to demonstrate the use of Longchamp teller who set the password. Even if the teller who accepted the use of Longchamp, set the password, but still can not rule out the ATM people to use illegal means to copy the card withdrawals may be, at a time when people do not enjoy the power of attorney withdrawal.