Quick Search


Tibetan singing bowl music,sound healing, remove negative energy.

528hz solfreggio music -  Attract Wealth and Abundance, Manifest Money and Increase Luck



 
Your forum announcement here!

  Free Advertising Forums | Free Advertising Board | Post Free Ads Forum | Free Advertising Forums Directory | Best Free Advertising Methods | Advertising Forums > Free Advertising Forums Directory > Message Boards Directory

Message Boards Directory These are similar to forums, but the posts are listed in chronological order and not by category. They also dont require any registration.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 03-28-2011, 06:43 PM   #1
heiixiuda202
 
Posts: n/a
Default Microsoft Office 2010 Upgrade cl�� Can Microsoft g

A judge has ruled that SCO doesn;t own the Unix copyright. — SCO;s claim to which was at the crux of its threats against Linux. What does this ruling mean to Microsoft, if anything?As my blogging colleague Dana Blankenhorn notes,Microsoft Office 2010 Upgrade cl��, the SCO ruling seemingly has no impact on Microsoft;s allegations of patent violations by the Linux and open-source communities.But industry historians may recall that Microsoft wasn;t totally removed from the whole SCO-Unix-copyright matter.Microsoft played matchmaker back in 2003 when SCO needed money to help fund its lawsuits agains IBM and various other Linux players and customers. Microsoft suggested that hedge fund BayStar Capital invest $50 million in SCO.Microsoft also backed SCO;s play to convince other vendors and customers to license SCO;s technology to avoid potential infringement lawsuits. (Maybe that;s where Microsoft got its patent-licensing ideas ….)One of the first companies to snap up two SCO licenses was Microsoft,Office Home And Student 2010 Serial Key, to the tune of $12 million, according to BusinessWeek. Sun Microsystems and Computer Associates also bought into SCO;s plan.I wonder if Microsoft will attempt to recoup its $12 million, now that SCO;s Unix licensing strategy has been exposed as a sham? I asked the Softies for any statements they might want to make, re: the SCO matter. So far, no word back.Update: Late on August 13, a Microsoft spokesman sent the following reply: “Unfortunately,Microsoft Office 2010 32bits, we won;t be commenting on the ruling.”Update No. 2: As Seattle Post-Intelligencer blogger Todd Bishop pointed out,Office 2010 Professional cl��, there is some wording in the judge;s ruling regarding who should get the royalty payments made by Microsoft (and Sun) to SCO. Bishop says the actual amount Microsoft paid to SCO is $16.75 million. The ruling makes it sound as if anyone is going to get paid back by SCO, it;s going to be Novell,Office 2010 Standard 64bit, not Microsoft.
  Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:02 AM.

 

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Free Advertising Forums | Free Advertising Message Boards | Post Free Ads Forum