Chaussures Louboutin Defendant

However, the defendant Pinghetang company said: its not a personal injury plaintiff's perpetrators, not the tortfeasor,Louboutin Pas Cher, the original defendant, no consumption between contractual relationship.



10 am yesterday, Changsha Intermediate People's Court judge came to the Wuyi Square Pinghetang the sixth floor of the scene to verify the evidence.


plaintiff: in the bathroom broke into eight disabled

○ Plaintiff: toilets there are significant security risks, claims 140,000; the defendant: the responsibility should fall on the plaintiff themselves


Defendant: Consumer contractual relationship between the two sides did not
Larry said the evening of 8 March 2009, he and his friends in Pinghetang a restaurant. During his time convenient to the toilet,Louboutin, cleaning staff is cleaning the toilets in case the accused health, water damage due to ground is dry, and cleaning staff are not being accused of any tips, leading to his exit from the compartment when the stool falls. Identified, Larry injuries constitute eight disabled. Larry that as consumers, accept the defendant in violation of the rights to personal service, a lot of inconvenience to their, they put each other to court, claims the loss of 140,000 yuan.

Pinghetang's attorney rejected the Court's judicial mediation, then the judges according to its issued a summons. Yesterday afternoon,Chaussures Louboutin, the case for trial and the sentencing court. The court held that the plaintiff requested the defendant to bear some responsibility, with the factual basis and legal basis, the Court support.

Restore site by the judge, the matter is as follows: At that time, there are women in men's room clean, so Larry urine into the compartment, the bathroom floor was slippery around without any prompts, coupled with the stool compartment space is too small to turn around , after urinating, Larry was out of the back compartment, resulting in level at the foot Caikong, leading to accidents.
the same time, the defendant provided to the public toilets free of charge, is a professional cleaning company commissioned by the standard manage-star hotel, fully in line with the In addition, the plaintiff is a full civil capacity of adults, the responsibility should fall by their own commitment.



○ Changsha Intermediate People's Court yesterday after the trial court verdict, Both sides said the verdict subject to no appeal to the spot required
However, with full civil capacity as adults, the plaintiff fell in the toilet, mostly because they no toilet facilities and to give adequate attention to safety hazards, their fault is the main reason damage should bear 60% of its own responsibility. Finally, the Court of First Instance ruled that the defendant Larry 25,000 yuan compensation. Both sides said the verdict subject to no appeal to the spot required.

-American Shila Li sixth floor of a restaurant in Changsha Pinghetang dining and accidentally fell in the toilet, causing multiple fractures. Things Hou Lali to Pinghetang bathroom there are significant security risk on the grounds, to be sued, claims 14 million. Yesterday, the Changsha Intermediate People's Court of First Instance on the case and the sentencing court, Pinghetang Larry 25,000 yuan compensation.
court: the plaintiff's own fault is the main reason