View Single Post
Old 04-06-2011, 07:21 PM   #1
wiooive355
 
Posts: n/a
Default Office Project Professionnel 2007 Cl�� Why Windows

Regardless of Microsoft;s claims to the contrary, the achievement Microsoft has enjoyed with Windows XP on netbooks isn;t assured to proceed with Windows 7.Microsoft officials are trumpeting this week, through a brand new posting around the Windows Weblog, that Pc Planet, the biggest electronics retailer inside the UK,Rosetta Stone Schwedisch, is removing Linux netbooks from all their shops and “going all-Windows.” Microsoft;s public line is consumers have spoken and they “want Windows because it’s the only OS that gives people the choice,Windows Small Business Server 2003 R2 Cl��, compatibility, familiarity and simplicity they need.”The post doesn;t mention that Microsoft offers Pc makers XP at a cut-rate price (estimated to be about $15 per copy for netbooks, compared to an estimated $35-plus per-copy for XP on laptops/desktops. It fails to acknowledge how few netbooks are running Vista — because Vista;s hefty system requirements made that proposition impossible. The post doesn;t mention the growing number of Microsoft OEM partners who are working on Android/Linux netbooks. (The latest to join that pack: Acer, which is promising an Android-based netbook for Q3 2009.) And it fails to note that Microsoft still has not publicly announced how and if it plans to get Windows 7 on ARM-based netbooks.Microsoft has a well-established love-hate relationship with netbooks — a class of PCs its executives prefer to call “small laptops.” Windows XP preloads on netbooks were one of the few bright spots for Windows during Microsoft;s Q3 FY 2009, which ended in March of this year. But Microsoft is having to do some fancy footwork behind the scenes — by restricting the screen size of PCs that qualify for Windows seven netbook pricing to 10 inches — in an attempt to keep netbooks from cannibalizing its Windows margins.Microsoft has demonstrated that test builds of even its heftiest (and priciest) Windows 7 SKUs can run on netbooks. But here;s the rub: Computer makers are expected to choose Windows 7 Starter Edition or possibly Windows seven Home Premium to preload on new netbooks because those SKUs will be the cheapest. Microsoft recently removed its three-concurrent-application restriction on Windows seven Starter Edition, but that low-end version is still missing a number of features that Microsoft is touting as Windows 7 selling points.Microsoft execs are holding towards the party line that even netbook users will be interested in paying to upgrade to a higher end Windows 7 SKU by way of a program like “Anytime Upgrade” (where users pay a fee to “unlock” more feature-rich Windows SKUs.During a recent appearance at the Cowan and Company Technology Media & Telecom Conference, Tami Reller, the Chief Financial Officer of Microsoft;s Windows Client Business, reiterated that stance. When asked about the anticipated SKU mix for Windows 7,Office Project Professionnel 2007 Cl��, Reller told attendees:“(W)e are confident there is high-quality ability to sell the Windows seven value prop all up to a netbook consumer, because what we have learned is that they;re … what they want to use a netbook for, in terms of applications and usage,Rosetta Stone Swedish, is actually not that much different than a notebook. They just use it in more bursts, they;re shorter periods of time, and in … and more on the go.”Reller also noted that while netbooks aren;t expected to important to most business users, they do play into Microsoft;s belief within the growing consumerization of IT. In Reller;s words, “(I)f you have consumers with an inherent interest and spoken demand for a product that will further help IT make a decision to sort of adopt more around it,Office Home and Business 2010 64 Bit(X64) Key, and move faster to a brand new version.”Do you believe the next generation of netbooks will be largely Windows 7 machines? Or could Linux/Android/Moblin actually make some headway against Windows starting with Windows 7 — and will this be primarily the result of Microsoft pricing/licensing missteps?
  Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links