5-year-old Tong Haohao (a pseudonym) fall death Station Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou City, are fine buildings regret the lift, once attracted wide attention. The vast building are fine family eventually paid 650,000 yuan.
However, the disputes brought before the end of the matter, are fine buildings have been manufacturing elevator company to court, claim 650,000 yuan. The case yesterday in Liwan District Court trial, due to complexity of the case proceedings will continue.
text / reporter Hooley
Plaintiff: automatically shut down the elevator floor door failed
by the Jing Jing Mansion is located in Guangzhou City Industrial Co., Ltd. (require the latter to bear the costs of litigation case. Are fine in court that in April 2001, are fine the company next door to the elevator company buys tractor-type cargo freight elevators, the elevator company responsible for the installation in buildings are fine. Elevator use, companies are fine companies commissioned by a qualified elevator maintenance, regular inspection in accordance with regulations.
5-year-old child repeatedly opened the elevator door
2009 年 8 月 12 at 11 am,
belstaff jackets, the elevator involved in an accident, caused vast death of the shaft fall. Elevator video data, only 5 years old in the elevator vast four times the normal operation of the elevator door opened easily, the last open door, vast in the video image disappears, the car door immediately shut itself down.
vast family found that children with the security personnel around but not find, in the elevator shaft of the bottomless pit that vast falling dead. To maintain social stability and to reduce accidents due to this and other losses, are fine company and the vast family mediation agreement is reached, and to pay compensation 65 million.
plaintiff refers to the opening force is too small
are fine the company said after the accident,
belstaff jacken, the Guangzhou Research Institute of Special Electrical and Mechanical Equipment Testing testing finds that involved elevator door device does not automatically turn off layer qualified.
are fine companies that, as the elevator manufacturer, elevator car door opening force of the company knows too small,
16- year-old boy kidnapped 4 -year-old girl next door, not a murder extortion postmortem, will endanger the existence of personal and property safety of others an unreasonable risk, but also luck to laissez-faire reasonable danger According to the lift of the video images show vast open the car door and the fourth to leave the car looking for means of escape when the car behind the door itself off immediately, so vast can not return the car. The fall in elevator shaft as a corollary, the elevator, there are many defects are the root cause of the accident.
defendant:
boy's death
had nothing to do
this case is vast in the fine families of all compensation paid by the company After payment to the court specifically mentioned the That the defendant elevator company to become, the court did not deal with negative things, the court devoted to the defense. Elevator's general views as follows: the accident caused the death of vast, with the elevator company does not matter. According to the facts of view, vast bear the main responsibility for their own, are fine bear secondary liability company
reason to lift the company also stated that the elevator has delivered 9 years ago, companies are fine to use, at the time elevator inspection is qualified. Later, the company are fine without the elevator company agreed to hire a third party without the elevator maintenance company, elevator had quality problems, companies should be responsible for the third. Moreover,
belstaff blouson,
16 university students being misled MLM organizations are nude photos, after the accident, the Guangzhou Municipal Quality and Technical Supervision has to report the accident found themselves bear the main responsibility for vast,
outlet belstaff, are fine companies have secondary responsibility. And are fine with the vast company's own consultation and payment of compensation the families, is without judicial process, the consequences should own, not entitled to recover the elevator company.
However, the elevator company's statement was fine in court are commissioned to refute them one by one attorney. His lawyer that a deemed Although the Guangzhou Municipal Quality and Technical Supervision has made
news playback
vast time of the accident
mother waiting for him
home for dinner
2009 年 8 12, had just come home from Jiangxi Province, Guangzhou vast soon reunite with their parents, alone in the elevator buildings are fine, unfortunately, fall into the elevator shaft death. According to diagnosis description, vast neck, left knee, the back was the ground state, had already lost consciousness, blood pressure, heart rate, breathing lacking.
Undoubtedly,
belstaff leather jacket, the vast no time to see it rushed into the elevator to the situation, leading to his fall from the fifth floor to the floor immediately killed. The vast death of the mother waiting for him to go home for dinner.